Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Giuliani's Team...
I am going to tak e a moment aside from my normal refusal to say much about Giuliani to comment on his announcment that Bill Simon wil be some sort of policy director for his campaign. As a Californian who was actively involved in the recall of Governor Gray Davis, after Bill Simon failed to beat him in the general election, I found this very interesting. Check out the Wikipedia article on Bill Simon.
My favorite quote: "Simon's gubernatorial campaign is viewed as being unprofessional to the point of being comical."
I couldn't agree more.
My favorite quote: "Simon's gubernatorial campaign is viewed as being unprofessional to the point of being comical."
I couldn't agree more.
The Campaign Plan...
Romney's secret campaign plan is out. Or, maybe it is a campaign document of some kind.
Notably, no reference to checking with SLC before taking action. Hmmm...
I like the following quote from the Boston Herald:
"The case for Romney, according to the plan, is this: 'Mitt Romney, tested, intelligent, get-it-done, turnaround CEO Governor and strong leader from outside Washington, is a better candidate than McCain & Giuliani to ensure that America's strength is maintained so we can meet a new generation of global challenges.'"
I commented on the new generation of challenges sometime back. Mitt is the candidate of the next generation. A fresh face in the world of the establishment.
Notably, no reference to checking with SLC before taking action. Hmmm...
I like the following quote from the Boston Herald:
"The case for Romney, according to the plan, is this: 'Mitt Romney, tested, intelligent, get-it-done, turnaround CEO Governor and strong leader from outside Washington, is a better candidate than McCain & Giuliani to ensure that America's strength is maintained so we can meet a new generation of global challenges.'"
I commented on the new generation of challenges sometime back. Mitt is the candidate of the next generation. A fresh face in the world of the establishment.
Monday, February 26, 2007
Romney Continues to Pressure Iran...
Romney continues to encourage states divest their pension funds of Iranian interests. And then this laughable article from the AP about the business deals of the Italian subsidiaries of companies Romney hasn't been associated with in years.
"Republican Mitt Romney is urging state pension systems to divest from Iran, yet the presidential contender's former employer and the company he started have links to recent Iranian business interests or deals."
"Bain & Co. Italy, described in company literature as "the Italian branch of Bain & C'o.," received a $2.3 million contract from the National Iranian Oil Co., in September 2004. Its task was to develop a master plan so NIOC — the state oil company of Iran — could become one of the world's top oil companies, according to Iranian and U.S. news accounts of the deal."
Scandalous, eh? Until some gems dropped in the article later:
"Bain & Co. Italy is owned by Italian shareholders."
"Fehrnstrom, meanwhile, noted Romney has not worked at Bain Capital since 1999, when he relinquished his ownership stake in the firm. He subsequently turned over his investments to a blind trust managed by a Boston law firm."
I think someone is trying a little too hard to find a story where there isn't one.
"Republican Mitt Romney is urging state pension systems to divest from Iran, yet the presidential contender's former employer and the company he started have links to recent Iranian business interests or deals."
"Bain & Co. Italy, described in company literature as "the Italian branch of Bain & C'o.," received a $2.3 million contract from the National Iranian Oil Co., in September 2004. Its task was to develop a master plan so NIOC — the state oil company of Iran — could become one of the world's top oil companies, according to Iranian and U.S. news accounts of the deal."
Scandalous, eh? Until some gems dropped in the article later:
"Bain & Co. Italy is owned by Italian shareholders."
"Fehrnstrom, meanwhile, noted Romney has not worked at Bain Capital since 1999, when he relinquished his ownership stake in the firm. He subsequently turned over his investments to a blind trust managed by a Boston law firm."
I think someone is trying a little too hard to find a story where there isn't one.
Solar Energy...
Mitt Romney is Solar Energy. I couldn't help but post this picture from a Romney speech at a Solar Panel Manufacturing Company about alternative energy. When your candidate is inadvertently given a sun halo, it must be a good sign.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Conservatives, Look No Further...
For goodness sake, get behind Romney already and quit hand wringing if you care about the future of the conservative social movement. Mitt Romney is a great guy that everyone can be proud to stand behind.
That was my response after reading a NYT article on the Council for National Policy meeting. Suspiciousness of Romney's conservative credentials is not reasonable if an honest look is taken at his record as governor. Furthermore, he has advocated more vigorously, enduring more opposition, for conservative principles than any other candidate.
For other people out there, like me, who believe it is important to continue to move the country in a direction that respects life, honors family and married life, and encourages personal responsibility, now is the time to give support to the candidate who will defend those values and who has the capacity to lead the country in a way that will further our cause.
Act now.
That was my response after reading a NYT article on the Council for National Policy meeting. Suspiciousness of Romney's conservative credentials is not reasonable if an honest look is taken at his record as governor. Furthermore, he has advocated more vigorously, enduring more opposition, for conservative principles than any other candidate.
For other people out there, like me, who believe it is important to continue to move the country in a direction that respects life, honors family and married life, and encourages personal responsibility, now is the time to give support to the candidate who will defend those values and who has the capacity to lead the country in a way that will further our cause.
Act now.
Friday, February 23, 2007
Energy Innovation...
Romney's energy plan is coming. Breitbart reports:
"It doesn't make sense for us not to become increasingly energy independent, and for that to happen, we're going to have to rely on technology, innovation of the same kind that you're seeing right here," Romney told about 100 employees at GT Solar Inc., which makes equipment in turn used to construct solar energy panels.
Of course, Romney understands that this innovation will come through the ingenuity of the private market. I am interested to hear his speech and his vision for promoting energy independence.
"It doesn't make sense for us not to become increasingly energy independent, and for that to happen, we're going to have to rely on technology, innovation of the same kind that you're seeing right here," Romney told about 100 employees at GT Solar Inc., which makes equipment in turn used to construct solar energy panels.
Of course, Romney understands that this innovation will come through the ingenuity of the private market. I am interested to hear his speech and his vision for promoting energy independence.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Early Primary States...
I haven't seen too much commentary about the push by states to move up their primaries to the beginning of February 2008. Visiting Atlanta yesterday, Mitt offered a few comments, courtesy of Access North GA, about an early Georgia primary:
"I am delighted to hear that your primary is being held early," Romney said. "I plan on making a good showing in Georgia."
"Right now, name recognition is what the polls are about," Romney said, adding that by February 2008 voters "will know who I am as well."
"We didn't know who Bill Clinton was. I wish we could've kept it that way," he quipped. "I anticipate continuing to build from the grassroots...and getting to know people on a person-to-person basis."
I think Mitt can do very well in Goergia. He is right, the important thing is development amongst grass roots activists.
California is sort of an interesting story on this issue. Here, the democrats are planning on moving up the primary in order to try and eliminate term limits in the state legislature in the same election so leading democrats won't be termed out of office. For the life of me, I hope we don't do it.
"I am delighted to hear that your primary is being held early," Romney said. "I plan on making a good showing in Georgia."
"Right now, name recognition is what the polls are about," Romney said, adding that by February 2008 voters "will know who I am as well."
"We didn't know who Bill Clinton was. I wish we could've kept it that way," he quipped. "I anticipate continuing to build from the grassroots...and getting to know people on a person-to-person basis."
I think Mitt can do very well in Goergia. He is right, the important thing is development amongst grass roots activists.
California is sort of an interesting story on this issue. Here, the democrats are planning on moving up the primary in order to try and eliminate term limits in the state legislature in the same election so leading democrats won't be termed out of office. For the life of me, I hope we don't do it.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Memories of Mitt...
An interesting collections of memories about Mitt in the New Hampshire Union Leader. Here is a sample of two of the best:
"Mitt had hired me as a young associate at Bain & Co. in 1978, and we worked together occasionally between then and 1983, when we laid the foundations for the creation of Bain Capital. For six months, we traipsed around the United States, Europe and Latin America, seeking investors to back our plan, getting plenty of “no, thank yous” along the way. "
"One potential investor was concerned that we would spend lavishly on fancy offices and needless expenses. I could tell that this bothered Mitt, because he is very careful about spending. Finally, I told the gentleman: “You need to understand how frugal Mitt is. When he and Ann go to the movies, they pop their own popcorn in advance. Mitt figures the home-popped Orville Redenbacher costs him only 62 cents, which is a whole lot cheaper than $4.50 for the big tub at the movie counter.”
— Coleman Andrews, co-founded Bain Capital with Romney in 1983
"When Mitt was at Bain Capital, I referred a couple of deals to him. In that business, you have to be a vacuum cleaner and amass more facts about the investment than anyone else in the world. That’s a skill set that serves him well. Romney was so successful as a private equity investor that he was able to command a 30 percent share of the profits for Bain as general partner. That figure normally would be 20 percent. He was the most successful private equity investor in the country and with his track record, people were happy to give a 30 percent share to Bain. If you pay sufficient attention to detail you have less risk. And with him, nothing is left to chance unless it has to be. He is running his campaign that way — marvelous planning at all levels."
— William Weld, Republican former governor of Massachusetts
"Mitt had hired me as a young associate at Bain & Co. in 1978, and we worked together occasionally between then and 1983, when we laid the foundations for the creation of Bain Capital. For six months, we traipsed around the United States, Europe and Latin America, seeking investors to back our plan, getting plenty of “no, thank yous” along the way. "
"One potential investor was concerned that we would spend lavishly on fancy offices and needless expenses. I could tell that this bothered Mitt, because he is very careful about spending. Finally, I told the gentleman: “You need to understand how frugal Mitt is. When he and Ann go to the movies, they pop their own popcorn in advance. Mitt figures the home-popped Orville Redenbacher costs him only 62 cents, which is a whole lot cheaper than $4.50 for the big tub at the movie counter.”
— Coleman Andrews, co-founded Bain Capital with Romney in 1983
"When Mitt was at Bain Capital, I referred a couple of deals to him. In that business, you have to be a vacuum cleaner and amass more facts about the investment than anyone else in the world. That’s a skill set that serves him well. Romney was so successful as a private equity investor that he was able to command a 30 percent share of the profits for Bain as general partner. That figure normally would be 20 percent. He was the most successful private equity investor in the country and with his track record, people were happy to give a 30 percent share to Bain. If you pay sufficient attention to detail you have less risk. And with him, nothing is left to chance unless it has to be. He is running his campaign that way — marvelous planning at all levels."
— William Weld, Republican former governor of Massachusetts
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
George Romney on Iraq...
This may end up being a controversial post, if anyone ever reads it:
On ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" there was a brief video of Mitt's father, Governor George Romney talking about why he changed from supporting the Vietnam war to opposing it:
"... I just had the greatest brainwashing that anybody can get when you go over to Vietnam."
If anyone has this video, let me know: presidentmittromney@gmail.com.
This quote demonstrates what a great American Mitt's father was. He saw a huge problem way before his time. Watching the video brings out the sarcasm that is not readily apparent in the cold quote. After he said this he continued to make his point. Time reported that while campaigning back in 1967: "he shotgunned Johnson Administration policies from the battlefields of Viet Nam to the wheat fields of the plains." I believe that if George Romney had been elected, our country would be in a much different place from where Nixon took us.
I believe Mitt Romney has the same ability to see problems. I also believe that although Vietnam and Iraq are very different battles, this quality will inform his decisions in regards to Iraq if elected President.
There is a breaking point in Iraq. We haven't reached it yet. So, for now, we must do all we can to help the Iraqi government continue to work at stabilization. That is our obligation and our best interest. I believe that Romney represents the most reasonable position:
"Across the nation, there is debate about our future course in Iraq. Our desire to bring our troops home, safely and soon, is met with our recognition that if Iraq descends into all-out civil war, millions could die; that Iraq's Sunni region could become a base for Al Qaeda; that its Shia region could be seized by Iran; that Kurd tension could destabilize Turkey; and even that the broader Middle East could be drawn into conflict. The possible implications for America and for American interests from such developments could be devastating. It could mean a future with far more military involvement and far more loss of American life. For these reasons, I believe that so long as there is a reasonable prospect of success, our wisest course is to seek stability in Iraq, with additional troops endeavoring to secure the civilian population."
Implicit in this statement is that if there is no reasonable prospect of success and no pragmatic reason to stay, America could change its approach. Romney is not beholden to any past votes or political positions; possibly losing face. Romney's interest in Iraq is purely the national interest. As a result, Romney has selected flexibility. Not flexibility to public opinion, but flexibility to the national interest. I find this rather similar to one of Mitt's favorite presidents, President Eisenhower.
This is also the reason I believe Mitt is the best Republican nominee. In the general election, independants who want to see a flexible Iraq policy will be more willing to vote for him than McCain.
On ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" there was a brief video of Mitt's father, Governor George Romney talking about why he changed from supporting the Vietnam war to opposing it:
"... I just had the greatest brainwashing that anybody can get when you go over to Vietnam."
If anyone has this video, let me know: presidentmittromney@gmail.com.
This quote demonstrates what a great American Mitt's father was. He saw a huge problem way before his time. Watching the video brings out the sarcasm that is not readily apparent in the cold quote. After he said this he continued to make his point. Time reported that while campaigning back in 1967: "he shotgunned Johnson Administration policies from the battlefields of Viet Nam to the wheat fields of the plains." I believe that if George Romney had been elected, our country would be in a much different place from where Nixon took us.
I believe Mitt Romney has the same ability to see problems. I also believe that although Vietnam and Iraq are very different battles, this quality will inform his decisions in regards to Iraq if elected President.
There is a breaking point in Iraq. We haven't reached it yet. So, for now, we must do all we can to help the Iraqi government continue to work at stabilization. That is our obligation and our best interest. I believe that Romney represents the most reasonable position:
"Across the nation, there is debate about our future course in Iraq. Our desire to bring our troops home, safely and soon, is met with our recognition that if Iraq descends into all-out civil war, millions could die; that Iraq's Sunni region could become a base for Al Qaeda; that its Shia region could be seized by Iran; that Kurd tension could destabilize Turkey; and even that the broader Middle East could be drawn into conflict. The possible implications for America and for American interests from such developments could be devastating. It could mean a future with far more military involvement and far more loss of American life. For these reasons, I believe that so long as there is a reasonable prospect of success, our wisest course is to seek stability in Iraq, with additional troops endeavoring to secure the civilian population."
Implicit in this statement is that if there is no reasonable prospect of success and no pragmatic reason to stay, America could change its approach. Romney is not beholden to any past votes or political positions; possibly losing face. Romney's interest in Iraq is purely the national interest. As a result, Romney has selected flexibility. Not flexibility to public opinion, but flexibility to the national interest. I find this rather similar to one of Mitt's favorite presidents, President Eisenhower.
This is also the reason I believe Mitt is the best Republican nominee. In the general election, independants who want to see a flexible Iraq policy will be more willing to vote for him than McCain.
Ann Romney for First lady...
My wife hasn't shown too much interest in presidential politics but we were able to watch the interview on ABC, Sunday morning, together. She told me that she thinks Ann Romney is a huge asset to Mitt. She called her "precious" and "genuine." She thinks she would be a first lady that America would love. She suggested that Mitt should try and have her along with him as much as possible in the campaign to come.
Friday, February 16, 2007
Jeb Bush on Romney...
While not officially endorsing Mitt, rumor is Jeb Bush is speaking very positively of Mitt:
"Governor Bush said, 'Before you commit, I want you to meet Mitt Romney. He is the kind of guy you will like no matter what,'" said former Lt. Gov. Toni Jennings. "The governor was very candid about the fact that he really liked this guy."
Yes, that is my quote, of an article, quoting the Lt. Gov., quoting the Governor. Three levels of hearsay each with a well recognized exception under the Political Evidence Code:
A statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if it is in support of Mitt Romney.
"Governor Bush said, 'Before you commit, I want you to meet Mitt Romney. He is the kind of guy you will like no matter what,'" said former Lt. Gov. Toni Jennings. "The governor was very candid about the fact that he really liked this guy."
Yes, that is my quote, of an article, quoting the Lt. Gov., quoting the Governor. Three levels of hearsay each with a well recognized exception under the Political Evidence Code:
A statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if it is in support of Mitt Romney.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
The War...
I continue to be interested in how the Iraq War is going to effect the Republican nomination. By and large, everyone has been generally supportive of the President's plan to increase troops.
As an outsider, Romney obviously brings a fresh perspective on the situation. He recently said, "I believe that so long as there is a reasonable prospect of success, our wisest course is to seek stability in Iraq, with additional troops endeavoring to secure the civilian population." That seems pretty modest. Not much to lose from such a position.
McCain has been advocating a troop increase for a long time. Now he is getting it. In effect, he is being vindicated, but what happens if it doesn't work? Does McCain then have to claim that the President didn't act quick enough to have more troops? If it does work, does that give him an edge over Romney?
If the situation continues to deteriorate even with more troops, McCain simply becomes one of the washington politicians who voted us into to a messy war. Many people, even Republicans, may want change.
Success in Iraq is something everyone longs for but expectations are more limited than ever. If a government is able to survive without such a large contingent of troops there, that would be success by most measures; even without great security. Limited success is not an asset to trumpet though.
However, if the situation improves, McCain could argue that his proposal to increase troops was right.
Now an interesting tidbit from the FT:
"Mr Romney’s prospects could benefit from fallout from Mr McCain’s support for the Iraq war. As a governor Mr Romney was never called to vote on the war and he has supported it only in general terms."
"His father’s presidential chances were undermined by remarks he made during another unpopular war, about having been “brainwashed” by generals and diplomats during a visit to Vietnam."
"Campaigning during the congressional elections last year, Mr Romney remembered his father and told the FT: 'He never considered it a gaffe. The fact the president had lied to the American people about Vietnam is something Americans needed to hear and he proved being right too early is not good for politics.'"
"That same lesson could yet haunt Mr McCain, to Mr Romney’s good fortune."
In other words, the res publica wouldn't have grown so disillusioned with the war if we had been successful with more troops early on. Since they are disillusioned now, even being right about the troop increase will be overshadowed by McCain's liability from supporting the war all along.
NPR also carried a story suggesting that McCain's support for the troop increase may is diminishing his maverick status with independants. They also discuss Romney and Giuliani's Iraq position. You can listen to it here.
As an outsider, Romney obviously brings a fresh perspective on the situation. He recently said, "I believe that so long as there is a reasonable prospect of success, our wisest course is to seek stability in Iraq, with additional troops endeavoring to secure the civilian population." That seems pretty modest. Not much to lose from such a position.
McCain has been advocating a troop increase for a long time. Now he is getting it. In effect, he is being vindicated, but what happens if it doesn't work? Does McCain then have to claim that the President didn't act quick enough to have more troops? If it does work, does that give him an edge over Romney?
If the situation continues to deteriorate even with more troops, McCain simply becomes one of the washington politicians who voted us into to a messy war. Many people, even Republicans, may want change.
Success in Iraq is something everyone longs for but expectations are more limited than ever. If a government is able to survive without such a large contingent of troops there, that would be success by most measures; even without great security. Limited success is not an asset to trumpet though.
However, if the situation improves, McCain could argue that his proposal to increase troops was right.
Now an interesting tidbit from the FT:
"Mr Romney’s prospects could benefit from fallout from Mr McCain’s support for the Iraq war. As a governor Mr Romney was never called to vote on the war and he has supported it only in general terms."
"His father’s presidential chances were undermined by remarks he made during another unpopular war, about having been “brainwashed” by generals and diplomats during a visit to Vietnam."
"Campaigning during the congressional elections last year, Mr Romney remembered his father and told the FT: 'He never considered it a gaffe. The fact the president had lied to the American people about Vietnam is something Americans needed to hear and he proved being right too early is not good for politics.'"
"That same lesson could yet haunt Mr McCain, to Mr Romney’s good fortune."
In other words, the res publica wouldn't have grown so disillusioned with the war if we had been successful with more troops early on. Since they are disillusioned now, even being right about the troop increase will be overshadowed by McCain's liability from supporting the war all along.
NPR also carried a story suggesting that McCain's support for the troop increase may is diminishing his maverick status with independants. They also discuss Romney and Giuliani's Iraq position. You can listen to it here.
Romney Lines up Insiders...
On Feb 13th, the L.A. Times had a rather good article (that's saying a lot) about Romney that hit the front page. Some excerpts:
"Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who had a limited national profile just a few years ago, is matching the better known Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) step-for-step in the race to round up support from an important audience: members of Congress and Washington lobbyinsts. Call it the 'insider primary.'"
"More members of Congress have announced support for Romney than for McCain: 26, including former House Speaker J. Dennis Haster (R-Ill.)"
"People close to Hastert were surprised that he endorsed Romney so early. But they were not surprised that he turned his back on McCain."
"To David Norcross, a lobbyist and one of New Jersey's repsentatives to the Republican National Committee, the early endorsements have established the validity of Romney's candidacy."
"'Early on, there are questions about whether a candidate is real,' Norcross said. 'This list lays that question to rest.'"
"Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who had a limited national profile just a few years ago, is matching the better known Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) step-for-step in the race to round up support from an important audience: members of Congress and Washington lobbyinsts. Call it the 'insider primary.'"
"More members of Congress have announced support for Romney than for McCain: 26, including former House Speaker J. Dennis Haster (R-Ill.)"
"People close to Hastert were surprised that he endorsed Romney so early. But they were not surprised that he turned his back on McCain."
"To David Norcross, a lobbyist and one of New Jersey's repsentatives to the Republican National Committee, the early endorsements have established the validity of Romney's candidacy."
"'Early on, there are questions about whether a candidate is real,' Norcross said. 'This list lays that question to rest.'"
Won't Vote for...
What makes voters not want to vote for someone? We have heard Mitt's religion is a problem. Consider the following from Politico:
"A USA Today poll released Wednesday shows that 24 percent of Americans would not vote for a Mormon (Romney), 30 percent would not vote for someone who has been married three times (Giuliani) and more than 40 percent would not vote for a “generally well-qualified person” for president who was 72 years old (McCain’s age by Election Day 2008)."
Hat tip to Evangelicals for sharing this.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Drudge Title Article...
The title "It's Mitt!" has been posted above the Drudge Report title all day today. The AP article linked is a very good piece overall on Romney's career in business, leading the Olympics, and as Governor. Some quotes from the article:
"'I do not believe Washington can be transformed from within by lifetime politicians," Romney said, seeking to turn a potential liability, his limited political experience, into an asset. "There have been too many deals, too many favors, too many entanglements - and too little real world experience managing, guiding, leading.'"
"A son seeking to succeed where a father failed, Romney became an official GOP presidential candidate flanked by his wife since 1969, Ann, their five sons and five daughters-in-law, and the Romneys' ten grandchildren - a not-so-subtle message that he is a family man."
"'I do not believe Washington can be transformed from within by lifetime politicians," Romney said, seeking to turn a potential liability, his limited political experience, into an asset. "There have been too many deals, too many favors, too many entanglements - and too little real world experience managing, guiding, leading.'"
"A son seeking to succeed where a father failed, Romney became an official GOP presidential candidate flanked by his wife since 1969, Ann, their five sons and five daughters-in-law, and the Romneys' ten grandchildren - a not-so-subtle message that he is a family man."
Monday, February 12, 2007
The Time Has Come...

Dear Friend,
On Tuesday, February 13, Governor Mitt Romney will travel to Michigan, the place he was born, to formally declare his intention to seek the Presidency of the United States of America.
As one of the Governor's earliest supporters, we invite you to watch his announcement speech streamed live on the web at 9:00 a.m. EST:
Click here to watch Governor Romney's presidential announcement.
As one of the Governor's earliest supporters, we invite you to watch his announcement speech streamed live on the web at 9:00 a.m. EST:
Click here to watch Governor Romney's presidential announcement.
The American people are looking for strong, new leadership to face a new generation of challenges. The early response from grassroots supporters like you has been truly phenomenal.
We hope you'll participate in the next step of Governor Romney's campaign. Please click the following link, pre-register to receive a reminder on the morning of the event, and then bookmark the page so that you can return on Tuesday to watch history in the making, streamed live to your screen.
Click here to watch Governor Romney's presidential announcement.
Click here to watch Governor Romney's presidential announcement.
Thank you so much for your support and encouragement of Governor Mitt Romney,
Beth Myers,Campaign Manger
Beth Myers,Campaign Manger
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
Drudge...
The first big story I have seen on the Drudge Report featuring Mitt. Picture and all. I was pretty excited.
The story covered Romney's speech to the Detroit Economic Club:
"When our party has been in charge, we didn't distinguish ourselves on spending restraint," Romney said. "That's got to change — and it would in my administration."
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Medved on Mitt...
Michael medved is one of the great republican intellectuals of our day. I say that with little hesitation. In addition to being able to listen to his radio show, I met him about a year and a half ago when he spoke at the University of San Diego School of Law.
While we in the blogsophere have discussed ad infinitum about whether Mitt's religiosity will hurt his chances at becoming President, it is something that people not tracking every conversation about Mitt still need to have resolved. It is nice to have Medved making that case on a much broader basis for us.
I recently mentioned Mitt to a democrat co-worker of mine that I think mitt is going to win the Republican nomination. He told me conservative christians would never vote for him. I told him to check out www.evangelicalsformitt.com.
While we in the blogsophere have discussed ad infinitum about whether Mitt's religiosity will hurt his chances at becoming President, it is something that people not tracking every conversation about Mitt still need to have resolved. It is nice to have Medved making that case on a much broader basis for us.
I recently mentioned Mitt to a democrat co-worker of mine that I think mitt is going to win the Republican nomination. He told me conservative christians would never vote for him. I told him to check out www.evangelicalsformitt.com.
Battleground Florida...
Amidst all of the press that Romney wil announce next week, an interesting article on the state of things in Florida...
"If early buzz and insider enthusiasm decided elections, Republican Mitt Romney would be well on the way to winning Florida's presidential primary next year."
"No presidential contender from either party has responded more vigorously to the likelihood that Florida will be among the earliest presidential primary contests and could play a decisive role in choosing the presidential nominees. "
"For a little-known underdog up against household names like Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, the former Massachusetts governor has done a remarkable job winning over Republican opinion leaders, tapping heavily into Jeb Bush's political network."
"If early buzz and insider enthusiasm decided elections, Republican Mitt Romney would be well on the way to winning Florida's presidential primary next year."
"No presidential contender from either party has responded more vigorously to the likelihood that Florida will be among the earliest presidential primary contests and could play a decisive role in choosing the presidential nominees. "
"For a little-known underdog up against household names like Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, the former Massachusetts governor has done a remarkable job winning over Republican opinion leaders, tapping heavily into Jeb Bush's political network."
Friday, February 02, 2007
Arizona...
What's most surprising about this article is that McCain only commands the support of 40% of republicans in AZ. This may be in part because he has turned his back on them on illegal immigration. I predict Romney will do very well in AZ.
Mitt on the Economy...
The Economic Speech is Coming. With his performance in Israel of the Iran Threat, I am excited to hear him in his expertise.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



